Category Archives: Parenting

Ruling by Exception

May 21, 2004

My dad was a lifelong smoker.  He tried his first cigarette at eleven years old, and the habit stayed with him until his death at 62.

My father died of lung cancer.  I tried to convince him to stop. Research on smoking was mounting everyday.  Smoking kills.

The biggest challenge to my pleas to dad came from other smokers.  At least once each year a major newspaper would print the photo of a hundred-year-old man who swore he made it to the century mark by smoking a cigar every day.  Mr. Exception.

Mr. Exception broke the rules on smoking, and he won.  We break rules all the time, and we make it.  We cross the street without looking, we forget to floss, we dash to the store and leave our seatbelt undone.  And we survive.

Nowhere does this rule of the exception shine brighter than with the subject of marriage.  Ms. Exception…she proves that marriage doesn’t matter.  She had ten children and raised them all herself, the veritable Enjoli woman who brought home the bacon and fried it up in the pan …by herself and for herself…and her brood of ten.  And that’s not all.

All ten children made it through college with PhDs, and today they drive Porsches and live in mansions on hundred-acre estates.  As a group, the terrific ten have developed the cures to the top twenty diseases worldwide.  Mankind will survive now, thanks to them. And they owe it all to their single mom who sacrificed everything in life to make it happen.  If she can do it, you can, too.

Single moms deserve our applause for making it.  But parents beware.  In our hurry to encourage women who raise families on their own, we run the risk of making the exception the new rule.

In the modern era of cultural redefinitions, Ms. Exception has been lifted high on a modern pedestal to make a woman feel guilty that she ever wanted something as ordinary as a husband, as common as a simple home where two people work together in love and harmony to raise two children.

How mundane.

How ordinary.

How limited in imagination!

Surveying the American landscape with its single moms and children, the visual message for our children is clear.  Marriage is an option.  But it isn’t necessary.

Movie actresses lead the charge.  Slipping in and out of marriages like changing dresses in the boutique, using their ample cleavage to lure the next boyfriend into a romp and a magazine cover, they vow that life was never so good as when they were freed from the shackles of traditional families founded on lifelong marriages and fidelity.

By failing to embrace marriage, we effectively give our daughters a new vision of the future.  We tell them, “You could be the next Ms. Exception, if only you would dream and plot and plan and scrape and skimp and save and struggle.  You could do it all on your own.  You could.”

After all, they could be the next Ms. Exception?

Is that the best we have to offer them…to let them struggle for success on their own?  What about the tried and true formula?  Marriage?

As one American voice, we could actually admit that social engineering has done nothing to create a better chance for success than a marriage between a man and a woman who love and honor each other till death do they part.  We could set marriage as a goal for our children and work to teach them how to succeed.

Where better for children to learn the true magic of unconditional love than in a family where Father and Mother model the daily work of giving and forgiving, of taking turns, of sharing the sublime and the mundane with the one special person they gave their life to?

Sure, it’s not easy.  It takes commitment and hard work…planning, forgiving, regrouping, and sacrificing.  But, for those who make it, the joy of a family together throughout a lifetime makes it all worthwhile.

The choice is fairly simple.  We can actively teach and guide our children to plan for and make families through marriage.

Or…we can let them do it themselves.  On their own.  They could be the next Ms. Exception.  Wow!  Imagine that!

See Archives for past editorials.

April 23, 2004:   m…m…m…Married?

May 14, 2004:   Order in the Courtroom!

One Stop Shopping

April 16, 2004

Comprehensive sex education…it’s being sold all over America.  The best thing about comprehensive sex education, we parents are told, is that it teaches our children everything.   That’s right…everything.

It teaches children how to say no…and then it teaches them that they can pleasure each other with mutual masturbation.

It teaches children how to say no…and then it teaches them how to put on a condom.

It teaches children to ask their parents…and then it hands them the address to the nearest clinic where they can get birth control and abortions without telling their parents.

It teaches children that some people save sex until marriage…and then it teaches children that marriage isn’t for everyone.

What is the true message comprehensive sex education gives our teens?  This is only clear when put into context with a real child.

In my first interview with an expert who had been teaching comprehensive sex education for over thirteen years, I came to the end of the hour totally perplexed.  “Safe sex”, perfect use, neutral values, healthy attitudes?  In a moment of frustration, I asked this expert about “my Daughter Debbie.”  What if “Daughter Debbie” sat in on your sex education class?

It’s a simple question, and I have tagged it the Ultimate Test Question for all sex education programs.  If you want to know what all the fancy talk and clever rationales mean, just ask someone about “your own Daughter Debbie.”

13-year-old Daughter Debbie

OK, so, what do you really teach?

What if my 13-year-old Daughter Debbie sat through all of your lessons on sex education and came to you as you were packing to leave with this question:

My boyfriend is at the high school.  He’s 16, and we’ve been talking about having sex.  It seems like if we use a condom we’ll be safe.  I’ve talked it over with some of my friends, and they’re already having sex.  We’re mature.  We know what we’re doing.  Everyone says if we use a condom that we’ll be safe.  I’m thinking I’m going to go ahead…What do you think?

In every interview with every adult who teaches comprehensive sex education, I have concluded with this question.  Not one of these adults would express any opinion to Debbie in answering her question.

At best, several said they would do a quick re-run of all the lessons and options presented.  They might encourage her to talk with “someone she trusts.”  I suggested that Debbie had chosen them as a trustworthy person.  They said she needed someone else.  I mentioned her boyfriend and her girlfriends.  Well…they paused.  And silence set in.

Thinking perhaps I had caught them off-guard, I suggested a possible response:  “As gently and quietly as possible, what if you told Debbie that ultimately she would have to make up her own mind, but that since she had asked you, you would have to say you would not recommend having sex at this point in her life.  Could you tell her that?”

“No,” came the quick reply each time.  “We don’t teach values.”

Most of these educators had been in “the business” for more than ten years.

Consider this additional fact concerning Daughter Debbie.  At 13, she and her sixteen year-old-boyfriend are considering the kind of sex called statutory rape in many states.

Can we really call it conscionable sex education to deny her the wisdom of our counsel—especially when she asks us?  “No, Debbie, I do not believe it is wise for you to begin having sex with your boyfriend.  Can I offer you some help in dealing with this problem?”

One stop shopping that sells children anything they want at any time in their lives is the core of the problem with sex education in America.  If we fail to place a value on sex, if we fail to discriminate between appropriate and inappropriate, if we fail to make value judgments, then we have no reason to be surprised when our children become pregnant and infected with STDs.

One stop shopping…educators who give our children a free pass to do whatever they want when they feel they are ready to do whatever they want…and educators who give them the tools to do it…are they part of the solution…or part of the problem?

One stop shopping…if we tell Daughter Debbie that she can buy anything in the store whenever she wants and that we will write the check for her…then we shouldn’t be surprised if she buys sex with her boyfriend.

Sex Education: Spinning the Truth

Jane Jimenez

Jane Jimenez

April 2, 2004

 Abstinence is an idea as old as the hills. We know abstinence works. It prevents unwanted pregnancies. We know you won’t come down with any of the 25 common STDs if you abstain from sex. So what’s wrong with abstinence?

Everything? That’s right. Some people are working to convince parents that abstinence education is unpopular, unrealistic, and unsafe.

Unsafe? That’s right. Some people claim that abstinence education is a two-minute lecture delivered by an uptight prude: Don’t do it. Just don’t do it. Say NO. And don’t ever, ever do it.

What we need, critics of abstinence cry out, is truth. We need medically accurate information. We need to talk about sex. Our kids need to know how to stay safe. They need more information than just saying No. They need the truth.

Truth? Consider that the abstinence teacher often spends as many as five to ten hours in one classroom. What are they talking about? Well, actually, they have quite a lot to talk about, and it’s just the kind of no-nonsense medically accurate information that could save a teen from the biggest mistake of her life.

How about these facts:

Medically accurate information proves the ineffectiveness of condoms in preventing serious STDs leading to infertility, lifelong genital herpes, and cervical cancer. Cervical cancer kills more women each year than AIDS. With teens, condoms approach a twenty percent failure rate in preventing pregnancy.

Meanwhile, critics of abstinence want to take over with their own brand of risky sex education. Their brand of truth ignores medical realities, suggesting that teens can flirt with sex and not get burned. What does risky sex look like? Try these ideas out:

Risky sex educators’ version of sex education counsels teens to try “outercourse.” This highly risky behavior, using their own definition, can include naked body-to-body intimacy just short of intercourse.

Risky sex educators put their version of “abstinence” into a virtual smorgasbord of sexual behaviors that teens can engage in…when they are ready. In their curriculum, abstinence is little more than an “option” that teens may abandon…when they are mature.

Research proves parents are the most effective educators of sexual values for their children. In spite of this, risky sex educators use “confidentiality” as a means of promoting secrecy that distances teens from their parents.

Best of all, risky sex educators are engaged in an all out attack on the money that supports abstinence education. They print articles and lobby legislators and governors. “Stop abstinence education,” is their battle cry.

So what kind of money are we talking about? While risky sex educators are concerned that $120 million is being spent on abstinence programs, it is reported that in FY 2002, the federal government spent half a billion dollars on teen sex-ed that ignores the medical realities of condom failures. We are paying risky sex educators to teach our children such “safe sex” concepts as outercourse.

What do parents get for their money? The “statistical results” of thirty years of the condom, outercourse, and “mature sex” message is evident. Today, one in five children over the age of 12 tests positive for herpes type 2.

What has happened to choice? Abstinence is an important option and choice parents deserve. It reinforces parental values by giving students truly medically accurate information to help them understand the importance of remaining sexually abstinent until marriage.

Abstinence education embraces the same no-nonsense, truth-telling approach we use in teaching young people about drugs, tobacco and drunk driving

It is a grassroots effort that has taken hold over the past ten years, fully supported by medical experts who have witnessed the explosion of the STD epidemic in their medical practices. During this same period of time, as abstinence education gains ground, the CDC in an extensive report just released says teen pregnancy, birth and abortion rates dropped from 1990 to 1999.

Abstinence educators know what our kids need. They talk medically accurate information. They give our children the information and reasons for saying No to sex. They know what risk is about, and they are not willing to put one cent into pretending that “outercourse” is a good idea. And that’s the truth.

Abstinence, the Real Deal

March 26, 2004

There is a heated battle going on in Arizona, a fight for money.

On one side, a million dollars sit in Washington, packed and ready for Arizona.  This million is designated to go to educators around the state who teach our children about sexual abstinence until marriage.

On the other side, there is a strong campaign to keep those dollars in Washington and let them grow mold.  And the strange thing about this campaign is that its organizers insist that they believe in the value of sexual abstinence.

“Don’t let them teach your children abstinence,” they keep shouting.  “We teach abstinence!  You don’t need them.  You need us!”

What does it matter who teaches our children?

What’s the big deal?  When talking about abstinence, what separates the million dollar abstinence from the regular old everyday variety of abstinence?  It’s a hard question to think about when we’re talking about sex.

It’s an easy question to answer when we talk about football.  Yes, football.

This is the time of year when grown men cry.  Hearts sink.  Dreams fade.  As the last sixty seconds tick off the play clock, one side of the field is a sight of celebration.  On the other side of the field, grown men hang their heads and come to terms with a broken dream.

So what’s the big deal?  It’s just a game.  And it’s just a silly football.  So what if you lose.  Not everybody can win.  In fact, everyone is going to eventually lose.  If you just prepared for losing, it wouldn’t be so hard.

Why don’t coaches have at least one session where players watch game films of teams who know how to lose with a smile?  How about a sideline coach on losing?  When you fumble the ball, you can sit with the coach and have him remind you it’s no big deal.  It’s just a game.

Sound ridiculous? Of course, it does. We know the point of playing football.  Losing happens.  But we plan to win.  It may be just a game.  But winning is the goal.  We set a goal, we train for the goal, and we believe in the goal.

The “million dollar” abstinence teachers are like the best NFL coaches.  They believe that sexual abstinence until marriage is a worthy goal.  They offer the medically accurate information that proves the inability of condoms to protect our children from serious life-long STDs.  They tell our children the truth that condoms approach a 20 percent failure rate with young people in preventing pregnancy.

“Million dollar” abstinence teachers are not afraid to stand on an uncompromising message that sexual abstinence until marriage is worth a million dollars.  They know most children dream of a future where they can enjoy a happy, loving marriage and one day raise a family.

“Million dollar” teachers set about coaching and planning to reach that goal.  They believe in children and their capacity to succeed.  They coach, mentor, encourage, and cheer for our children…just like the best of the NFL coaches.  They refuse to sidetrack their lessons with lessons on how to fail and enjoy it.

There is another way to teach abstinence.  It is possible to tell children that abstinence is hard to do, that not everyone can be abstinent, and that in fact, if you do it “responsibly,” losing at abstinence can actually be fun and “somewhat safe.”  It is possible to tell children that “mature” people have sex, and that when our children are ready to be “mature” they will put abstinence behind them.  Marriage?  Well, it’s not for everybody.

Currently, many millions of dollars are paying the teachers who make “losing at abstinence” look like fun.  If we really want our kids to succeed at staying sexually abstinent until marriage, we should be willing to put a fair share of money behind those teachers who consider abstinence a worthy goal and are willing to coach our kids to win.

There are many ways to “talk about” abstinence with our children.  But not all of them are worth a million dollars.  Abstinence as a goal–winning at abstinence–that’s the real deal.